Social Currency


As we’ve been discussing here at Social Currency, Nonprofit Finance Fund’s 5th annual State of the Sector survey provides a national snapshot of conditions on the ground, but it also gives us a wealth of data on individual subsectors. To follow up on our recent post about small nonprofits, we’re taking a closer look at what the survey reveals about how small nonprofits are managing in the wake of the recession. 

According to the National Center for Charitable Statistics, three-quarters of all registered nonprofits nationwide have budgets of less than $1 million. This same group comprised 48% of our survey’s total respondents, amounting to 2,822 organizations. Among these small nonprofits, over half (57%) primarily served or were located in low income communities.

Managing Demand for Services

Our key findings about the state of service demand for small nonprofits in 2012 were that:

  • More than three-quarters (76%) saw demand for their services increase
  • Less than half of providers (48%) were able to meet community need

To cope with these challenges, small nonprofits took a variety of service-related actions last year. Yet, when compared to larger nonprofits, small organizations were not as likely to make changes to programs or technology:

Service-related actions (2012)

Respondents with Annual Expenses < $1M (view in Analyzer)

Respondents with Annual Expenses > $1M (view in Analyzer)

Added/expanded programs or services

43%

53%

Increased the number of people served

37%

44%

Collaborated with another organization to improve/increase services

35%

42%

Upgraded technology to increase/improve service efficiency

22%

37%

Managing Finance & Operations

In the areas of finance and operations, small organizations appeared nimble in their ability to adjust their business models, with 24% changing the main ways they raised and spent money in 2012 (which was relatively the same for large organizations). Small organizations, however, appear less able to free up resources for participation in system-changing activities, such as conferences or government advocacy.

Operations-related actions (2012)

Respondents with Annual Expenses < $1M (view in Analyzer)

Respondents with Annual Expenses > $1M (view in Analyzer)

Change the main ways in which you raise & spend money

24%

25%

Attend conferences or network to build relationships

49%

60%

Advocate to government on behalf of your organization’s cause

33%

51%

Add to reserve funds

16%

24%

Seek funding other than grants / contracts (such as loans and investements)

15%

22%

Supporting Effective Change

We’re heartened to see small nonprofits taking much needed steps to sustain their business and their mission—and with the right support, all of these challenges are surmountable. But it requires a concerted effort between organizations and their funders to address ingrained, systemic challenges in an increasingly uncertain operating environment. Change is both expensive and risky. NFF encourages nonprofits to talk with their funders about their actual operating reality and funding needs. But our survey shows little progress in this area when compared to previous years.

When asked what topic they could have an “open dialog” about with their funders, respondents said:

 2013 Survey of Nonprofits Funder Dialogue

These issues are critical to the operational health of any nonprofit. And when left unattended, any of them can create management challenges and wreak havoc on an organization’s finances. NFF created a tip sheet for nonprofits and funders, offering our advice for navigating many of these topics. We would welcome comments below from those who have had success making these conversations a regular part of the grantee-funder relationship.

This month, NFF released its fifth annual State of the Nonprofit Sector Survey. Of the nearly 6000 respondents, more than 900 hailed from the arts and culture sector, representing 47 states.

The data provide a wealth of information about how arts and culture organizations are managing through an unprecedented time of economic and artistic flux. Current trends point to lasting changes in the way the sector operates and is funded. The arts specific survey results are available in their entirety here. I also encourage you to check out our online Survey Analyzer, where you can further filter the data by state, sector, operating expense and other dimensions.

These are the headlines.

Arts & culture organizations continue to operate with thin margins and low liquidity: 

“As the economy declined, we chose to sustain programs as much as possible to help maintain our local economic impact and community service. Consequently, we depleted our cash reserves that were normally used for capital maintenance and expansion projects. Today, these reserves are completely wiped out and our capital needs are mounting up.”

--Arts, Culture & Humanities NPO, FL

  • 42% of survey respondents reported an operating surplus in 2012, compared to 44% in the previous year.
  • The outlook for 2013 is more uncertain: just 28% predict ending the year with a surplus. 50% say 2013 will be the same as or harder than 2012.
  • The sector remains divided between the 'haves' and 'have nots': 60% of arts organizations reported three months or less of cash on hand. While 20% added to reserve funds in 2012, an equal number drew down already limited liquidity.
Read More

In a world where the last two years have produced 90% of all data ever created (so says IBM), there is something to be said for avoiding information overload. This is especially true for nonprofit organizations whose leaders must constantly balance money and mission, while marshaling ongoing evidence of social and financial performance. With limited finance staff and multiple sources of financial information, it’s no wonder these leaders and their supporters often struggle to tell a clear, compelling financial story that makes sense of all the data.

How can nonprofit executives, funders, and advisors identify what matters most when examining finances? What are some trends and indicators that can guide us through an abundance of data and help assess true financial health?

Not all financial indicators are created equal. Below, I offer a short list based on NFF’s years of experience lending to and advising nonprofits. You can find this data on historical-looking documents such as audited financial statements and Forms 990, as well as on forward-looking internal budgets and projections.

Strapped for time to do this number crunching yourself? Financial SCAN, a data platform developed by NFF and GuideStar, can do this analysis for you, illustrating trends in an organization’s financial performance through user-friendly dashboards and graphs. You can also use the tool to see how one organization’s financial metrics and ratios stack up against its peers.

INCOME STATEMENT INDICATORS:

  • Revenue reliability. Rather than overly focusing on the ratio of earned to contributed revenue, we suggest evaluating revenue reliability – an organization’s track-record of bringing in recurring dollars, on an unrestricted operating basis, year after year. Reliable revenue doesn’t always come from the same sources providing the same amounts of money. However, it does suggest an ability to predict a level of income with a fair amount of certainty, based on historical performance and an understanding of market dynamics.
Read More

Ed. Note: Sadly, this post marks the last of Kim Cook’s contributions to Social Currency as an Associate Director on NFF’s Advisory Services team.  But we are delighted to share that she has been appointed President of the Arts Council of New Orleans where she will take the helm in just a few short weeks. Click here to read through Kim’s thoughtful contributions to Social Currency over the last two years. We wish Kim the best of luck, with all certainty that New Orleans’ arts organizations could not be in better hands!  
---

In the last year, as I’ve worked with nonprofits to examine their business models, explore the economics underlying their programs, and reflect on the relationship between their money and their mission, I’ve observed a common thread.  I see resilient, smart, and determined leaders reaching an impasse as the methods they are accustomed to using cease to work, leaving them groping for effective strategies for sustainability.  Most nonprofit leaders have weathered a storm or two.  It has never been easy for nonprofits to survive, let alone navigate the challenges of fundraising, program delivery, and complex grant and contract-compliance. 

In our years of work, NFF has encouraged leaders and board members to transition from subsistence break-even budget management to building balance sheets with a composition of assets that prepare the organization for sustainability.  To traverse that distance requires the courage to navigate new territory when the current course is already uncertain and past techniques for righting the ship have become insufficient.

How do we move from coping to adjusting, and how do I differentiate between the two?  As I observe it, coping is anchored in a range of approaches that have appeared to work in the past.  These include:

  • Belt-tightening
  • One time board member loan
  • One time large donor gift
  • Urgent messaging/rescue fundraising campaign
  • Use of a Line of Credit to fill cash gaps
  • Expenditure of cash reserves meant for cash flow
  • Borrowing against endowments
  • Letting Accounts Payable build up
  • Furloughing staff during slower periods

What these methods have in common is that they rely on the assumption that the organization is contending with a short term set of exigent circumstances that are expected to return to a previously more normal state.  They are not sustainable, and once belt-tightening has undermined the organization’s infrastructure (often impeding fundraising ability), there are no more loans or special fundraising efforts to be undertaken, and the staff is exhausted.  Once an organization has charted this course, it is very hard to get it back on track.

What, then, does it mean to adjust?

Read More

Since the end of the 2008 financial crisis, the US has seen faltering signs of economic recovery. But underneath these glimmers of improvement are the 46.2 million poverty-stricken Americans that have seen little change. With poverty at record levels, our nonprofit safety net and the 10.7 million workers who sustain it are shouldering an unprecedented responsibility and showing the strain. Nonprofit Finance Fund’s 5th annual survey captures this economic reality through the voices of 5,983 nonprofit leaders. Here’s an overview of our national results -- to take a closer look, check out our survey brochure and filter the results for yourself using our 2013 Survey Analyzer. There’s more to come: in future posts, we’ll take a look at how the sector is coping in an era of more need and fewer resources and explore some of the solutions organizations are adapting to fundamentally change the way we work. 

Community Need For Services is High

Chartifact 2013 Human Services and DemandWhile organizations show slight signs of financial improvement, this is also the 5th straight year in which they reported dramatic increases in service demand. 78% of respondents reported an increase in demand for services, about half of respondents weren’t able to meet that demand. Organizations that work on the front lines saw even greater community need, with 85% of respondents that served low income communities reporting demand increases and 63% unable to meet that need.

While we at NFF strongly encourage nonprofits to always balance money and mission, the reality is that coping with demand can mean turning people away. And this is incredibly difficult for nonprofits to do. Says one survey respondent: "Homelessness is on the rise and youth homelessness is increasing daily. In order to maintain the integrity of our program, we must turn students away once we reach our maximum capacity. It is a challenge daily to know that you may be leaving a teen on the street due to funding limitations.

The Uncertainties of Government Funding

Meanwhile, government support continues to falter, leading many to believe that programs for the public good are experiencing long-term disinvestment.  Of the 47% of respondents with state/local funding or contracts, a huge 86% said that the funding failed to pay the full cost of services. On top of that, payments were delayed for more than half of respondents, with 10% reporting delays that were more than three months late. Reports were similar, although not quite as severe, for the 29% of respondents with federal funding/contracts. As one respondent puts it: "The social safety net has been gradually chipped away for decades. Non-profits, private donors and volunteers simply cannot fill the yawning chasm between services needed and government support currently provided. We and our network of member agencies are strained beyond capacity. The neediest families continue to need more, while further cuts in government support are inevitable."  To fill the revenue gap caused by payment delays, organizations have had to tap into reserves, draw on lines of credit, cut staff costs, reduces services, and more.

Read More

Update 3/7/2013: As communities prepare for the effects of sequestration, it's important that, in addition to readying themselves as we suggest below, nonprofits share their stories about what sequestration will mean for their ability to continue to deliver services to those communities.  The National Council of Nonprofits has created a site that includes resources for nonprofits and an opportunity to tell us all what sequestration will mean for your organization and the people you serve.  We urge you to do so: GiveVoice.org
___

For nonprofit financial service providers like us, the web is a grim place today as the sector grapples with what the looming sequester will mean for the thousands of organizations providing lifeline services across communities.  An article in the Huffington Post
lays out the stakes for needy families, and a piece in the Nonprofit Times digs into some of the specific and immediate cuts, declaring that the sequester is here.  The news for nonprofits is uniformly frightening. Tim Delaney, CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits puts it starkly: “The time for playing politics is over. Real people in every community from coast-to-coast and border-to-border are being hurt.”


But, if you are responsible for the financial management of a nonprofit organization, what should you do on Monday morning?  What are some concrete steps you can take to make sure you are as prepared as possible for these cuts as they cascade across the economy?

  • Assess how your organization’s revenue streams may be affected following cuts due to sequestration. You can learn a bit more about how cuts will be allocated in your state by digging into the documents here.  
  • Determine which services are core and most critical to the communities your organization serves.
  • Assume some expense reductions will be necessary and identify where costs may be cut.  
  • Determine whether temporary staff reductions or furloughs are necessary.  
  • Identify where payments to vendors may be delayed in the near term.  Reach out to these vendors to negotiate terms.  
  • Explore collaboration with peers or complementary service providers.
  • Communicate with stakeholders.  
  • Tell your organization's story at GiveVoice.org

None of these conversations are fun.  We know that.  And we always want to avoid having to have them under immediate threats. But in the long run, these are conversations that any organization should have anyway so that they are maximally prepared to cope with unpredictable events of a less congressional nature

With our state of the sector survey in full swing, we’re already taking a look at early responses.  Thanks to the organizations who have weighed in so far, some important themes are already  emerging in the qualitative responses. Over the next few weeks, we’ll be exploring some stories survey respondents have shared with us in discussing the challenges their organizations faced in 2012, and how they responded to those challenges. Please do take the survey and share your own perspective!

Estimates indicate that, by 2050, the number of people 65 or older will have grown by 135% since the start of the millennium, rising  from 12.7% to 20.3% of the total population. As quality of life and health care improve in the United States, we are also living longer. Over the last thirty years, the number of people 90 years old or above has tripled, according to the US Census.

In this year’s survey, nonprofits are sharing stories about the impact of these changing demographics on several dimensions of the nonprofit enterprise including programs and services and human, social, and financial capital.

Increased demand

Doctors and nurses are preparing for new ways of delivering care to older patients with multiple chronic illnesses, while government still struggles for a solution to the oncoming financial issues facing the Social Security and health care systems. Says one survey respondent working in the field of health care education: “Our health care system is becoming increasingly fatigued, strained by a physician shortage, retiring practitioners and a wave of aging baby boomers placing a tremendous strain on the infrastructure’s ability to handle the increased patient load. The bottom line: we need more physicians and health-care professionals…[Our organization] is stepping up to meet the needs of our community by increasing our class size and number of graduates by 36% from 2009 to 2017.”  

Changing demand

In responding to this demographic trend, one Human Services survey respondent observes that organizations providing elder care will see an increasing need to expand the breadth and types of services they offer in order to help older adults age in place. Individuals will need services to grow and change with them, as they evolve through different stages of need, requiring nonprofits to take a deeper role across the spectrum of care-giving activities:  “We serve the elderly, keeping them safe in their own homes.  As they continue to live longer, their needs rise. Thus our expenses rise to assist them,” she notes. “Example:  a client arrives at age 70, and we provide transportation as needed. Flash forward 14 years, and our typical client is 84 and lives alone.  She/he now needs hot meals and light housekeeping. Flash forward another 10 years, and that same client will need help with bathing, additional housekeeping, a phone pal, minor home repairs, and emergency assistance for medical service payments.”  Economic stress has shifted the demand profile as well.  An Oregon-based healthcare organization reports: “The number of seniors who will need our meal service is increasing exponentially as the Baby Boomers turn 60. The age group 60-69 is our fastest growing, because they have been hardest hit by economic downturn and forced early retirement. We need to develop a comprehensive funding plan so we aren't scrambling to make our budget each year, but have a fund that provides enough interest to help pay for increased programming.”

Shifting donor base

The aging population also presents a challenge to organizations’ financial capital. Several noted that many of their individual donors are above retirement age. With government funding on the decline, organizations are tasked with finding new ways develop reliable revenue from a broader spectrum of donors.

Read More

Recently in the Huffington Post, Christina Villegas wrote a fascinating article that provided a critique of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), a seminal piece of legislation that has protected vulnerable populations from abuse since 1994. Up for re-authorization in the Senate this week, VAWA failed to win approval in the House earlier in the year, primarily due to the fact that the new legislation aimed to expand protections to immigrants and LGBT communities (see stories here, here, and here).

Amid the flurry of responses, (including NFF’s Social Currency and Money & Mission blog), Villegas has raised the interesting issue of data, questioning VAWA’s community impact and arguing that it has never undergone rigorous evaluation. With the strain of tight resources overshadowing the social sector, this question of impact is on the minds of all nonprofits: how do we prove our impact and know what’s working and what’s not?

In fact, VAWA HAS gone through rigorous, ongoing evaluation. 2000 Legislation of VAWA required the Attorney General to report biennially on the ‘effectiveness’ of VAWA funding, resulting in a long-term collaboration with the Muskie School of Public Service’s Catherine E. Cutler Institute for Child and Family Policy. Muskie School went on to develop and implement a substantial reporting program that resulted in a 2010 report here. The School is also slated to release a follow up report in 2013. 

VAWA supports 12 diverse programs—from education and training to end violence against women with disabilities to promoting arrest policies and protection order programs. Therefore, indicators of effectiveness vary across program areas. Here’s the long and short of findings on the effectiveness of VAWA, according to the report, starting first with the simple ‘outputs’ – or basic measures of productivity—surfaced from the data collected:

Read More

On January 30, the Catalyst Fund hosted an event to celebrate the release of two new publications highlighting emerging lessons and success stories in nonprofit collaborations.  The event represented an important milestone in building momentum and infrastructure for supporting strategic collaborations among nonprofits in the Boston area.  The event featured a panel of nonprofit leaders who have recently engaged in strategic collaborations through the support of the Catalyst Fund.  The panelists addressed a standing-room only crowd of nonprofit leaders, providing an open and honest dialogue about their objectives and motivations for collaboration and the challenges associated with planning and implementation.  While the nonprofit sector has historically shied away from structured collaborations, audience questions and feedback presented a picture of eager and engaged nonprofit leaders looking for tactical guidance on how to find and initiate conversations with potential partners. 

Weren’t able to participate in person?  An archived video of the event can be seen below or here


Video streaming by Ustream

 

Still want to learn more?  The Catalyst Fund’s Interim Assessment Report (pdf) provides key insights into the characteristics of successful collaborations and shares additional stories of lessons learned in the pursuit of nonprofit collaborations. 

The Catalyst Fund will be reviewing applications on a quarterly basis in 2013.  For more information about the application process, guidelines and timeframe please visit the Catalyst Fund’s website

The U.S. Surgeon General estimates that at some point between pre-kindergarten and 12th grade, about 1 in 5 American children will need treatment for mental health issues.  Sadly, only a small number will get the care they need to succeed in school and life. Based in Oakland, CA, East Bay Agency for Children (EBAC) helps address this urgent need by providing students experiencing emotional and behavioral difficulties—most of them from low-income families—with vital mental health, family support and educational services.

Nonprofit Finance Fund (NFF) worked with EBAC in 2006 after they received a United Way Program Award that included funding for capacity building and financial consulting. “It couldn’t have come at a better time,” said Executive Director Steve Eckert. “There’s so much passion in the world of direct service. But we’re not always as strong as we think we are in our understanding of finance. The reality is that internal capacity building is often an overlooked piece of what makes a nonprofit successful in their mission. When NFF came in and did financial training and analysis, it totally re-framed our strategic process and made us realize how important it was to get periodic outside expertise.”

NFF worked closely with Eckert and EBAC’s management team to better understand and articulate the organization’s programmatic story in financial terms. After many conversations and a review of several years of audited data, NFF collaborated with the EBAC team to share the organization’s financial patterns, strengths and weaknesses with the finance committee and board.

The analysis revealed that, as the organization’s funding from government contracts had increased, so had its instability: With bigger government contracts came increasingly complex receivables schedules and an exponential increase in budget size without a commensurate increase in reserve. EBAC, which receives nearly 80% of its revenue from the government, reflects the challenges facing many human services providers. While programs expand, behind the scenes, cracks begin appearing in their foundations, as monthly budgeting becomes more difficult to manage and the infrastructure starves. 

NFF recommended that EBAC begin working towards building 3 months of operating reserves to protect against the impact of uneven monthly revenue.

Read More

Search Blog

Inquire about an NFF Loan

Find NFF here...