Attendance at the TCG Fall Forum on Governance is comprised
of primarily executive directors and board members, with a sprinkling of
representation from artists and staff members from the nonprofit theater
world. So, after a day of terrific conversations,
it was with great pleasure that I gathered a handful of them together for a
panel discussion: “So You Have a Deficit, Now What?” What followed was a refreshingly frank
discussion punctuated with practical lessons applicable to the work of any
nonprofit administrator:
Preliminaries
We began with a few general concepts:
- Talk of deficits demands a consideration of
assets, but some valuable assets don’t appear on a balance sheet. Assets
can also include intangibles such as: audiences,
knowledge, staff members, a board of directors, openness to change, technological
tools and savvy, diversity of background and age among your staff, board and
stakeholders, civic and business partners, your “brand”, organizational self awareness,
and, critically, when seeking to overcome deficits, knowing your impact.
- When considering “health” metrics at NFF, we
think in terms of “months of cash” on an Unrestricted Liquid Net Assets (ULNA)
basis. If you strip away all of the
buildings, property, equipment, temporarily restricted, and permanently
restricted items from your Net Assets, how much cash is left for
operations? It can vary, but a rough starting
point for an ideal is a 3 month cash/ULNA reserve.
- Deficits can be “financed” through a variety
of means including: accounts payable, mortgage debt, drawing on reserves,
foregone wages, employee furloughs, and over-extended lines of credit. It can be difficult to ascertain whether an
organization is operating at a deficit, and structural operating deficits can
be masked by a period of operating at sub-par capacity levels in order to keep
expenses in-line. This will not be
sustainable.
Managing Costs and
Revenue
Tracy E. Long, General Manager of Adirondack Theatre
Festival started off the panel by describing an initiative to overcome a
$29,000 shortfall on a prior year’s performance, an 8% deficit on the annual
budget. While the scale may seem
relatively small, the deficit posed a significant challenge to their cash flow
and was an ongoing concern. Long took on
the deficit by addressing both revenue and costs:
Revenue side
- Increase
ticket revenue on the margin by raising ticket prices by $3 each.
- Develop
theater projects with partners to share costs but generate new and increased
revenue.
- Respond to
board member interest in hosting a “Brewfest” with board member spouses and
another nonprofit to generate fundraising revenue.
Cost Side
- Decrease
rehearsal periods for plays that could still be produced effectively with
shorter advance time,.
- Change the
design on printed materials to result in lower printing costs.
- Cut the
full-time production manager and move to a “variable” staffing method – hiring
as needed for theater tech and sharing the management tasks among the remaining
staff.
Accumulated vs.
Structural Deficits
Michael Gennaro, Executive Director, Trinity Repertory
Company, began by making two important points:
- Even well
managed companies are beginning to fail.
- Accumulated
deficits and structural deficits are different and managing them requires
different strategies.
Michael drew from his experience with the Pennsylvania
Ballet as his first example. When he
went there he found an accumulated deficit of $2 million on a $6 million
operating budget. In that instance
Michael suggests the first step is to analyze what makes up the debt you are
inheriting and evaluate any creative strategies you can employ to get rid of
it. At the Pennsylvania Ballet, the debt
was almost completely financed through accounts payable, so Michael negotiated
a “work-out” with the vendors to pay a percentage on the dollar of outstanding
bills and thus retire the deficit.
In his current tenure as the Executive Director at Trinity
Rep, he inherited a more challenging scenario: Three separate lines of credit were maxed out
or frozen, and the building required an expensive update to meet fire code
standards. Together, they amounted to
more than $3 million dollars of accumulated deficit with the cost of deferred
upgrades to the building generating a structural deficit. In this instance he took the following steps:
Read More