Social Currency

Editor's Note: A version of this post originally appeared at the ASU Lodestar Center Blog as part of their Research Friday series.  

As we work with clients, provide workshops, and present on nonprofit finance issues across the country, one question pops up again and again: how much cash cushion should a nonprofit have? One of my NFF colleagues recently explained why the answer is different for every organization and depends on a number of factors. One rough benchmark often cited recommends nonprofits have enough cash to sustain operations for at least three months. Having less than one month of cash at your disposal is generally considered a cash crisis. 

NFF finds that organizations holding three to six months of cash have an easier time thinking long term and building up reserves: a rainy day fund, facility reserves, etc. Organizations with reserves are better prepared for an emergency (major building repairs, loss of a primary funding source, severe economic upheaval) and in a crisis it’s more likely that they can continue providing their services uninterrupted.

Earlier this year, nearly 2,000 nonprofit leaders completed our annual State of the Sector Survey. One question asked was, “How much cash (including reserves) does your organization have readily available?” Nationwide, 9% of the social service providers who responded reported having “0 months” of cash. Another 20% had enough to cover 1 month of expenses, while 34% reported that they had “2 - 3 months” of cash on hand. So the results seem to say that just about a third of social service agencies are experiencing a cash crisis, another third are managing, and the remainder has a comfortable cash cushion.

In practice, however, our consultants see a very different picture.

Read More

Back in June, NFF's Kristin Giantris sat down with The Rockefeller Foundation's Managing Director, Antony Bugg-Levine, to talk about the state of play around the emerging financial structures known variously as Social Impact Bonds or Pay For Success Projects.  (Here's an earlier Social Currency post that provides a little background information if you're unfamiliar.)  It's an enormously illuminating conversation about who the various players are, where dangers and sources of conflict might lurk, and what the way forward might look like.  

NFF's partnership with Rockefeller has coalesced into a new "Learning Hub" website (available at either nffsib.org or payforsuccess.org) that gathers interested parties in one place along with the latest news and information about Social Impact Bond and Pay For Success pilot projects.    I've embedded the full length interview with Antony Bugg-Levine here below, but over at the Learning Hub we've broken the interview up into separate chapters by topic and included a written recap of the highlights.  I hope you'll have a look.  And, while you're in the mood, sign up for our July 28th webinar, The Impact on Service Providers: Opportunities and Challenges of PFS/SIB Participation.

How many out there think that your organization owns a lot and yet still seems to struggle to pay the bills?

If you’ve answered yes to this question, you’re not alone. I recently attended a fascinating Financial Leadership Clinic presented by NFF’s Jina Paik, Kayla Rosenberg, and Phil Rosenbloom and wanted to share one of the many graphics that we at NFF often use to show why the total net assets doesn’t always do a good job of reflecting the ready cash an organization has on hand to cover expenses.

In the chart below, we show how a nonprofit’s various revenue sources—temporarily restricted contributions, unrestricted contributions, earned revenue, and permanently restricted funds—contribute to your total net assets. Yet not all of those assets are actually ‘liquid’ or readily available. (We have yet to find a vendor that accepts our desk chairs in exchange for goods or services!)

What makes the nonprofit sector different from the for-profit sector is the restrictions on our contributions. While revenue coming into a for-profit business tends to be more liquid, nonprofits contend with temporary and permanent restrictions that complicate their finances and cloud the bottom line. That’s why we at NFF always encourage nonprofits to pay attention to the liquid portion of their Unrestricted Net Assets (water in the bucket diagram) in addition to calculating months of cash to determine what they have on hand and assessing their organization’s needs. 

NFF's Nonprofit Finance Buckets: What’s Left Over to Pay the Bills?

Search Blog

Inquire about an NFF Loan

Find NFF here...