Social Currency


Once a bill that sailed through Congress, free from bipartisan debate, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is now under attack. VAWA was first passed in 1994, on the heels of the O.J. Simpson trial, bringing new resources to local law enforcement and providers to develop collaborative approaches in dealing with domestic violence. Research by the RAND Corporation seems to suggest that in California, this funding has provided critical resources that have not only lessened the rate of incidents of domestic violence per capita but has also resulted in a decrease in the severity of the violent act. 

Since then, VAWA has helped improve violence prevention programs, rape crisis centers, legal aid for survivors of domestic and sexual violence, and much more.  When VAWA recently came up for re-authorization, Representatives Jan Schakowsky and Judy Chu sponsored a bill that would expand protections for Native American women, the LGBT community, immigrants, and others that are poorly covered under the Act’s current regulations.  Passed by every woman in the Senate, the bill has been opposed in the House with an alternate bill, HR 4970, that decimates protections for some of the most vulnerable members of our society.

State budget cuts have already wreaked havoc for the shelters and other service providers that help victims of domestic and sexual violence. In our work with DV service providers in California, budget delays and cuts have caused closures and increasing fragility that are forcing the sector to entirely re-think their business model.  Further cuts to federal legislation will force even more organizations over the brink. 

Legislation like HR 4970 would not only cause further financial peril, but could have very a significant and downright dangerous impact for victims. Our work with organizations like the Center for the Pacific Asian Family and the South Asian Helpline and Referral Agency has underscored the critical need for culturally-relevant services for immigrant populations. Among other things, HR 4970 would require the abuser be notified that victims were seeking support from VAWA. This not only decimates confidentiality, but tramples their civil rights. 

To speak out against HR 4970, sign UltraViolet’s petition at http://act.weareultraviolet.org/sign/vawa/?source=uv_website. Learn more about VAWA and other legislation supporting victims of domestic violence at http://www.nnedv.org/policy/issues/funding.html

To learn a little more about the funding history of DV organizations in California, check out the timeline below.

 

Editor's Note: This post originally appeared May 1st, 2012 on NFF's Money and Mission blog at the Chronicle of Philanthropy.  

Nonprofits and their donors often see endowments as the route to financial stability, but they aren’t the right solution for every organization. Here we debunk some of the longstanding myths about endowments.

Myth #1: A strong, sustainable nonprofit needs an endowment.

The one thing that sustainable nonprofits need is enough income to run their programs and pay for salaries, facilities, etc.  An endowment is one of many ways nonprofits can generate income. But for some groups, it is unnecessary or even a bad idea.

So before deciding to establish an endowment, nonprofits should decide if doing so addresses how income will be used to achieve the mission, when it will be needed, and how much will be needed. Organizations that are in financial crisis, that have limited capacity to attract more donors, or that have short-term missions should avoid establishing endowments.

Myth #2: An endowment must be continuously funded and can never be drawn down.

Nonprofits can choose when it’s most feasible to add to their endowments. For example, if it’s important to increase direct aid during a natural disaster, a relief organization might reduce or even forgo endowment funding for some period of time and redirect donors to an emergency appeal.  Alternatively, the board might continue to fund the endowment regardless of its current needs if, for example, it has a far-reaching goal, such as to eradicate hunger.

While most endowments have permanent restrictions on the use of their principal, others have only temporarily restrictions or even completely unrestricted components that allow the money to be spent. Endowments can also have end dates rather than existing in perpetuity.

Myth #3: An endowment is the same as a board-designated reserve account.

A designated reserve account is a pool of funds established by the board to provide certain types of capital to the organization. There are several kinds of designated reserve accounts: A working-capital reserve can provide funds during normal parts of the business cycle when cash is low–for example, when awaiting payment on a contract. A “rainy day” reserve is available for unexpected challenges or opportunities. Funds can also be reserved to help an organization recover from financial distress or to expand or acquire facilities. These pools are managed internally, though the board may place restrictions on their use.

Endowments, on the other hand, are not intended to fund routine operating activities and are often managed externally or held outside of the reach of the nonprofits’ general business managers.

Myth #4: There are limits on the amount of interest income that a nonprofit can take from its endowment

There are no such legal limits. The amount and timing of distributions is determined by the governing body of the endowment. Interest income is often used to fund board-designated reserves for future projects and to expand current programs and services. Nonprofits should, however, have realistic expectations about the yield on endowment investments. Only a large endowment that is professionally invested to maximize returns is likely to generate enough earnings to make a dent in the operating budget. Community foundations are well suited to manage smaller endowments.

When nonprofits recognize how fluid money can be, they can better assess the types of capital and cash flow they need to support both short- and long-term objectives and avoid making unnecessary trade-offs. They will also be able to tell a more compelling financial story to donors, clearly articulating their rationale and timing needs for a range of funding options including endowments, reserve accounts, grants, loans, and investments.

Search Blog

Inquire about an NFF Loan

Find NFF here...